Here's Matt Walsh's article on it:
Friday, December 18, 2020
Matt Walsh explains why sex work isn't real work
Work? What is it? Matt Walsh offers several definitions. Whether or not "sex work is work" is really irrelevant. I mean someone could put in a lot of time and effort to harm people. Would that be work? Perhaps technically. You can still call certain types of work evil. So there is no conflict there. But again, the left boils everything down to a slogan. "Sex work is work". They hope you will just get their implication that sex work is just like any other type of work. But we know it's not good work and it harms people.
Pope Francis will be featured in a new documentary by Netflix, yay........
I just can't wait to see what Netflix produces in conjunction with the pope. I mean you have to ask, if Netflix is allowing this documentary, knowing their standards for evaluating things like this, what can we possibly expect?
I don't expect this documentary to provide really any value whatsoever. I hate to say this, really I do. I wish Netflix would produce morally good content, things which could uplift and edify people of faith. But they don't and they have strict policies against anything which appears to disagree with their extremist ideology.
So Pope Francis is teaming up with this outfit. We don't know precisely what this documentary will look like. It's described as:
a documentary series based on "Sharing the Wisdom of Time," a book in which Pope Francis called for creating "an alliance between the young and old people" by sharing their stories.
One very telling part for me was
"The elders chosen for the documentary come from different ethnic groups and religious traditions, according to the Netflix press release, but their stories demonstrate how in every part of the world and in every culture people are concerned with the same issues: "love, struggle, work and dreams."
Why is Pope Francis promoting other religious traditions? That's not his job. His job is to promote and promulgate the Catholic Faith around the world. That is literally his job. Why does Pope Francis continually try to muddy the waters and create confusion. The Church is universal, but the Church is also missionary. We must reach out to evangelize people.
This will surely just be another confusing, content-free, feel-good, emotional documentary that will offer little value.
Are Covid and Climate Change the Greatest Threats to Christians?
In 2015, Pope Francis published his second (of so far three) encyclical called Laudato Si. The first encyclical was actually started by Pope Benedict, so it was not entirely chosen by Pope Francis. In Laudato Si, Pope Francis talks extensively about climate change and the dangers to the planet and people. He uses very strong language, denouncing many things in our modern society including fossil fuels, various types of development and progress, and more. He even gets into the nitty-gritty by denouncing air conditioners. In one part, the pope says:
The earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth.
Well, it doesn't seem that he is shying away from exaggeration. It seems he truly believes the earth is in a state of total ruin and we are destroying whatever is left of it.
Of course we are called to protect the Earth and not unreasonably destroy it, but the problem is that people are starting to worship the Earth, to see human beings as some kind of intruders. This attitude is diametrically opposed to our Catholic Faith. According to the Faith, human beings are the pinnacle of God's creation on Earth. We take care of the earth not for the sake of the earth as such, but for our own sake and the sake of future generations. It must be a human-centric approach to the environment.
Unfortunately this is not the message that is conveyed by Pope Francis. He has criticized people for having too many children or for trying to use the resources of the Earth to improve their lives. As usual, he creates a very black and white proposition. Either one is opposed to new technology, fossil fuels, or using the Earth's resources or they are bad people. But things aren't so simple.
For one thing, to say the Earth is getting much worse depends on one's perspective. The Earth and the environment are actually getting much better for humanity. How so? Well, the number of people dying from climate-related reasons is dropping dramatically. Because of fossil fuels and advances in technology, people can "weather" the storm of climate events much better than in the past. From a human-centric point of view, things are improving not getting worse.
On top of this, many factors are improving all the time such as air quality, water quality, and overall quality of life. Another important point is that technology advances in a somewhat predictable way, kind of like rungs on a ladder. If you remove rungs, people don't advance to the higher levels faster, they are prevented from ever getting there.
There was significantly more pollution in our environments during the industrial revolution than now. In the third world, many people cook indoors where huge amounts of soot and smoke fill their meagre homes. Forcing them to adopt solar energy before logically moving onto much cleaner forms of fossil fuels prevents millions of people from escaping their tiny smoke-filled hovels and moving into more modern homes. I see this all the time with aid agencies such as UN agencies. They mandate that in order for a poor country to receive aid, they must immediately implement the latest technology. Of course this technology is extremely expensive and so implementation takes very long and few people benefit. Electricity generated using coal may not be super clean, but it's better than cooking with dung or coal inside one's house.
From a human-centric point of view, it is much better to allow a country to progress naturally than to stunt its growth in order to implement ecofascist rules based on the elevation and possibly worship of the Earth.
Another "emergency" that the Holy Father has latched onto recently is Covid. He has made it the subject of many sermons and appearances. Not only that, many in the Church have taken on the topic of Covid with great zeal and energy. Is it proportionate?
This is a subject I have been blogging about for some time now - the Church's response to Covid. There are many issues I have with it. Overall, I believe the reaction to this coronavirus is completely out of proportion to what it is. I'm not claiming Covid-19 doesn't exist or isn't dangerous, especially to some people, but I just don't think it merits a place of ultimate importance in the Church.
Every day at Church we hear not one but two announcements concerning Covid-19. I wrote about that here. I cannot think of any moral or theological issue which has been discussed to the same degree as Covid by a long shot. To me, it's as if disease and death did not exist until sometime in early 2020 when Covid became a topic of prominence. That's how ridiculous it has become. We not only give instructions, we hear special prayers to those affected by Covid, homilies on Covid, and the whole nine yards.
It's not a question of whether or not Covid should be taken seriously, it's a matter of degree. Should it be given pre-eminent importance over every other issue in the world?
Recently I was reading something by St. Alphonsus Liguori concerning the 4th commandment. He was discussed what constituted sins against the commandment to love our mother and father. He said that in the Old Testament those found guilty of grave offenses against mother and father were put to death. Then St. Alphonsus said something interesting. He said that although we do not now face the death penalty over dishonoring our parents, we potentially face something far worse: eternal damnation.
As a people of God whose home is not this Earth but rather heaven, this should mean something to us. We should not be so overly concerned about this temporal world. We don't dismiss it as if it's not real, but we don't place it as the most important thing in the universe.
I bring this up because during all of these announcements regarding Covid, amidst all the strict regulations we must follow while in Church such as keeping our distance, wearing a mask, not receiving the Blessed Sacrament on the tongue, etc, we rarely if ever hear about sin. We rarely hear about being in a state of Grace, which is a state of Friendship with God Almighty. We hear so much about the temporal passing world, and this one particular disease, but we pay far less attention to something far more dangerous which is sin. Over 99% of people will survive Covid, especially those who are young. Aren't eternal truths far more important?
I remembering reading an account of a priest during a plague outbreak in Europe. During this pandemic which was vastly more dangerous than Covid, some priests would fearlessly attend to their flocks. I will attempt to recall by memory a story I heard recounted from many centuries ago. In the midst of a vast plague that was extremely dangerous, a priest was out looking for people in need of the sacraments. While walking, a man who was assumed to be dead and had been thrown into a pit of corpses (which was to be burned) arose, and upon seeing the priest called out and asked to receive the Last Rites. He was given Viaticum and Extreme Unction. So great was the faith of this man and the priest.
I believe the Church in North America and other places is far too subservient to the state. We must demand absolute autonomy. Why should the Church, instituted by Christ 2000 years ago, bow before the state which ebbs and flows like the tide and is in constant flux, prompted not by love of God, but by political gain. I believe the Church would do a much better job of protecting both the physical safety as well as the spiritual safety of her people.
The Church has a responsibility, in my opinion, to demonstrate that her primary and in fact only obligation is towards the spiritual well being of her people. It must also be shown that spiritual concerns always trump temporal, physical concerns. "You are dust and unto dust you shall return" but our souls are eternal. This is the message which must be strongly promoted.
Readings for Friday, December 18, 2020 in the Catholic Church
Friday of the Third Week of Advent
Lectionary: 194
Reading 1
JER 23:5-8
Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD,
when I will raise up a righteous shoot to David;
As king he shall reign and govern wisely,
he shall do what is just and right in the land.
In his days Judah shall be saved,
Israel shall dwell in security.
This is the name they give him:
“The LORD our justice.”
Therefore, the days will come, says the LORD,
when they shall no longer say, “As the LORD lives,
who brought the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt”;
but rather, "As the LORD lives,
who brought the descendants of the house of Israel
up from the land of the north”–
and from all the lands to which I banished them;
they shall again live on their own land.
Responsorial Psalm
PS 72:1-2, 12-13, 18-19
R. (see 7) Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
O God, with your judgment endow the king,
and with your justice, the king’s son;
He shall govern your people with justice
and your afflicted ones with judgment.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
For he shall rescue the poor when he cries out,
and the afflicted when he has no one to help him.
He shall have pity for the lowly and the poor;
the lives of the poor he shall save.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
Blessed be the LORD, the God of Israel,
who alone does wondrous deeds.
And blessed forever be his glorious name;
may the whole earth be filled with his glory.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
Alleluia
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
O Leader of the House of Israel,
giver of the Law to Moses on Sinai:
come to rescue us with your mighty power!
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
Gospel
MT 1:18-25
This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about.
When his mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph,
but before they lived together,
she was found with child through the Holy Spirit.
Joseph her husband, since he was a righteous man,
yet unwilling to expose her to shame,
decided to divorce her quietly.
Such was his intention when, behold,
the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said,
“Joseph, son of David,
do not be afraid to take Mary your wife into your home.
For it is through the Holy Spirit
that this child has been conceived in her.
She will bear a son and you are to name him Jesus,
because he will save his people from their sins.”
All this took place to fulfill
what the Lord had said through the prophet:
Behold, the virgin shall be with child and bear a son,
and they shall name him Emmanuel,
which means “God is with us.”
When Joseph awoke,
he did as the angel of the Lord had commanded him
and took his wife into his home.
He had no relations with her until she bore a son,
and he named him Jesus.
Thursday, December 17, 2020
#JohnCandy is trending on Twitter in Canada today
#JohnCandy is trending in Canada on Twitter today. I am not sure why. I really loved John Candy movies. He seemed like a genuinely funny and nice guy. He was also Catholic! He definitely left us too soon!
This photo comes from one of my favorite movies of his: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. Candy's funeral was held at St. Martin of Tours Catholic Church in Los Angeles.
The New Religion of Covid Compliance
It seems a new religion has emerged. First it was Climate Change and now it's Covid Compliance. People are using very religious language when it comes to this whole pandemic and our obligations to conform. It's actually really strange to be honest. To make things worse, the new Covid religion is being advocated to the injury to other religions. Let me explain how.
I see posts all over the place - Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, various websites, etc - demanding compliance to all the Covid protocols. These posts don't stop at simply asking people to keep distance from one another or to wear a mask. They get right into moralizing and self-praise.
People are getting very self-righteous. "I don't wear a mask to protect me, I wear one to protect you." Some twist the words of Jesus to love one's enemy by making a similar point in the context of the pandemic. "I may not like you, but I will wear a mask to protect you." Oh wow, truly we're living in the time of the Beatitudes!
Anyone not complying to the letter of the ever-changing laws of Covid is deemed to be selfish and immoral. On the other hand, those who comply praise themselves as being loving, caring, and overall great people.
Must be nice to think you are a morally virtuous person because you wear a piece of cotton over your face in public. Every year it seems there is a new morality among the non-religious. One year it's climate change with people proclaiming their moral superiority because they are decrying "others" who pollute. Another year people are patting themselves on the back for being "woke" when it comes to gender. Whatever the topic of the day happens to be, there is an army of people clamoring to show just how virtuous and righteous they are with regards to their ever-changing moral code.
These are all things we have come to expect. But one thing that is new is how these newfangled zealots are not satisfied with simply promoting their cause du jour. They must now intrude on what everyone else is doing and try to stop that as well. It's like they aren't satisfied to live and let live. Perhaps it's out of jealousy. I'm not sure.
So what exactly am I talking about? I'm referring to politicians and others mocking traditional Christianity and telling Christians to just stay home. Using an extremely condescending tone, they are suddenly theological experts who feel qualified to pronounce that you don't need to pray in a church, God is everywhere, you can just pray to him from your house! Yes, because these people know so much about God!
First of all, I feel compelled to respond to this line of reasoning. Should Christians be satisfied to simply "stay home" because God is everywhere and can hear your prayers? Let's break it down. Yes, God is absolutely everywhere. Yes, we can pray to God from anywhere. However, we must delve into the Catholic understanding of worship. The what and the Who.
The Catholic Faith isn't only about a one-to-one relationship with God, where we don't listen to anyone else and we are just free-floating autonomous agents in the world. Rather, we worship both individually and communally. In fact, community is a central part of our faith. In the creed, recited since the earliest days of our Faith, we declare that we believe in the communion of saints. The saints in heaven pray for us here on Earth. We also believe in a communion of believers. This is why we say someone is in communion with Rome. We, the members of the Church, are united to the visible head of Church on Earth who is the Roman Pontiff.
It goes even beyond this. Jesus Christ gave us his body, blood, soul, and divinity in the form of bread and wine so that we can partake of him weekly or even daily. Jesus Christ literally dwells within those who partake of this great gift and sacrament.
“He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.” – John 6:56
Some people are unable or unwilling to attend Mass in person. For many, this is a painful reality. In many places, people are dispensed from their Sunday obligation. I can definitely understand where these people are coming from. There is nothing shameful or wrong about being unable to attend Mass.
However, it is not up to random politicians to decide how important the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is to Catholics. It just really annoys me when some guy or girl, who may or may not even be the slightest bit religious, decides they know what's best in terms our relationship with God Almighty. That is not up to them! How dare someone project their personal beliefs on me when it comes to God. No one gets to say how important in-person worship is to me. That's not for them to decide.
This attitude just represents such unbelievable levels of arrogance. Not only arrogant in that they think they know what's best for everyone else, but also arrogant in they assume the role of speaking for God. I wouldn't even mind as much if they approached the subject with humility but they don't. They approach it with condescension, and even mockery. But God will not be mocked.
It was always my understanding that religion enjoyed a special privilege in society, especially in Canada and the US. It is an inalienable right. And yet, when the slightest thing happens, the slightest infectious disease spreads, all of a sudden our most basic fundamental human rights are thrown out the window for our "safety". We need to really stand up against these tyrants, big and small, if we hope to maintain any shred of independence and religious freedom.
In the early days of the Church, Christians were asked to just make a small "reasonable" offering to a false Roman deity and be on their way. They refused because they did not want to break the first commandment of not having strange Gods before the one true God. Because of this, many of them were martyred. They had such great faith and many are revered to this day. Are we willing to stand up against the tyranny of little dictators in our government?
P.S. I just want to say this is a difficult subject. I'm not setting myself up as an example of someone who always opposes the government. I wear my mask in public places. I am simply saying we need to stand up for our rights and it's not up to politicians to decide for us how important our churches and sacraments are in our spiritual lives.
St. Joseph does not speak in the Bible [meme]
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/21263948-catholic-memes
Readings for Thursday, December 17, 2020 in the Catholic Church
Readings for Thursday, December 17, 2020 in the Catholic Church
Thursday of the Third Week of Advent
Lectionary: 193
Reading 1
GN 49:2, 8-10
Jacob called his sons and said to them:
“Assemble and listen, sons of Jacob,
listen to Israel, your father.
“You, Judah, shall your brothers praise
–your hand on the neck of your enemies;
the sons of your father shall bow down to you.
Judah, like a lion’s whelp,
you have grown up on prey, my son.
He crouches like a lion recumbent,
the king of beasts–who would dare rouse him?
The scepter shall never depart from Judah,
or the mace from between his legs,
While tribute is brought to him,
and he receives the people’s homage.”
Responsorial Psalm
PS 72:1-2, 3-4AB, 7-8, 17
R. (see 7) Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
O God, with your judgment endow the king,
and with your justice, the king’s son;
He shall govern your people with justice
and your afflicted ones with judgment.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
The mountains shall yield peace for the people,
and the hills justice.
He shall defend the afflicted among the people,
save the children of the poor.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
Justice shall flower in his days,
and profound peace, till the moon be no more.
May he rule from sea to sea,
and from the River to the ends of the earth.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
May his name be blessed forever;
as long as the sun his name shall remain.
In him shall all the tribes of the earth be blessed;
all the nations shall proclaim his happiness.
R. Justice shall flourish in his time, and fullness of peace for ever.
Alleluia
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
O Wisdom of our God Most High,
guiding creation with power and love:
come to teach us the path of knowledge!
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
Gospel
MT 1:1-17
The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ,
the son of David, the son of Abraham.
Abraham became the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers.
Judah became the father of Perez and Zerah,
whose mother was Tamar.
Perez became the father of Hezron,
Hezron the father of Ram,
Ram the father of Amminadab.
Amminadab became the father of Nahshon,
Nahshon the father of Salmon,
Salmon the father of Boaz,
whose mother was Rahab.
Boaz became the father of Obed,
whose mother was Ruth.
Obed became the father of Jesse,
Jesse the father of David the king.
David became the father of Solomon,
whose mother had been the wife of Uriah.
Solomon became the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
Abijah the father of Asaph.
Asaph became the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Joram,
Joram the father of Uzziah.
Uzziah became the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
Ahaz the father of Hezekiah.
Hezekiah became the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amos,
Amos the father of Josiah.
Josiah became the father of Jechoniah and his brothers
at the time of the Babylonian exile.
After the Babylonian exile,
Jechoniah became the father of Shealtiel,
Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
Zerubbabel the father of Abiud.
Abiud became the father of Eliakim,
Eliakim the father of Azor,
Azor the father of Zadok.
Zadok became the father of Achim,
Achim the father of Eliud,
Eliud the father of Eleazar.
Eleazar became the father of Matthan,
Matthan the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary.
Of her was born Jesus who is called the Christ.
Thus the total number of generations
from Abraham to David
is fourteen generations;
from David to the Babylonian exile, fourteen generations;
from the Babylonian exile to the Christ,
fourteen generations.
Wednesday, December 16, 2020
Andrew Coyne on how Assisted Suicide
This is a very well-written essay by Andrew Coyne. He makes the point that assisted suicide went from being barely tolerated in certain rare cases, to being applied in a far broader way. Coyne argues that the way this new "right" is defined, there is no way it will not end up becoming more and more available.
I will post his article in its entirety. It is very shocking and eye-opening:
Our cautious start to assisted suicide is now an accelerating drive toward death-on-demand - December 11, 2020
Full Article:
Six years ago, before the Supreme Court discovered a right to die in the constitution’s guarantee of the right to life, what most people understood as the case for assisted suicide was something like the following: a mentally competent adult, suffering acute pain from a terminal illness and facing more of the same to the end, comes to a firm and unwavering decision to kill herself – but is physically unable, by virtue of the same illness, to do so unaided, or fears she will be unable to when the time comes.
That was the condition of Sue Rodriguez, whose 1993 Supreme Court appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Criminal Code prohibition on assisting in a suicide, though unsuccessful, first brought the issue to public attention. It was also the condition of Gloria Taylor, the woman on whose case the Court based its 2015 decision legalizing the practice (Lee Carter, whose name is attached to the decision’s short-form title, was merely a co-appellant).
Had you predicted then that the right to an assisted suicide would soon come to apply, not only in cases of physical pain but psychological, and not only to patients in the last agonizing stages of death but those who were nowhere near it – had you predicted, indeed, that a patient’s request to be killed would not even have to be repeated and persistent for a doctor to act on it, that the whole process could be telescoped into a single day – you would have been accused of “slippery slope” thinking.
Had you predicted that, by 2019, just the third full year after it was legalized, nearly one in 50 deaths in the country would be by assisted suicide, even on the (almost certainly underreported) official numbers; and that, this having been accomplished, talk would turn to extending the procedure – not just to competent adults, but the mentally ill and even children – you would have been carted off.
Yet that, incredibly, is where we are. The cautious, limited exceptions that people understood the issue to involve at the start – what most people understand it to involve even now – have been overtaken by an accelerating drive toward death-on-demand. Had the public known this was where we were headed, they might have objected. Instead it has been done in stages, a series of bait-and-switch routines in which the courts and legislatures have taken equal part.
The irony is that the very foundation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Carter was that there was no such slippery slope. Perhaps assisted suicide, once legalized, might have spread and metastasized in other countries, barbaric places such as Belgium and the Netherlands, to include children, people suffering depression, prisoners serving life sentences, and so on – but that, the Court was certain, could not happen here. The evidence was “anecdotal.” The “medico-legal culture” was altogether different.
And yet the Court immediately undermined its own premise. Though the decision ostensibly applied only “in the factual circumstances of this case,” i.e. to “people like Ms. Taylor” or “persons in her situation,” i.e. “wracked with pain” and near the “end of life,” by the time the Court got around to working out the general principle to be applied in such cases it had ditched any requirement that a patient’s condition be either terminal or physical; rather just “grievous and irremediable.”
Still, the decision did not preclude governments from imposing such a rule, even if the court declined to do so – if not that death be at hand, then at least “reasonably foreseeable,” in the language the Trudeau government adopted in subsequent legislation. So when a Quebec Superior Court judge ruled that provision unconstitutional in September, 2019, she was essentially freelancing.
The government had ample grounds to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. Instead, it drafted legislation – Bill C-7, which it is now attempting to rush through the House of Commons in time for Christmas – that obediently accepted the Quebec court’s opinion as its own. Worse, it went further.
No longer would there be a mandatory 10-day waiting period between a request for assisted suicide and its execution, to allow for a change of heart. (According to Health Canada, 263 such requests were withdrawn in 2019.) Neither would two witnesses be required: henceforth, one would suffice.
And the Justice Minister promises more: to the objections of some that the bill excluded those suffering exclusively from a mental illness, the minister promises this will be the subject of a forthcoming review. As will the idea of extending it to “mature minors.”
Well, of course it will. It was obvious it would from the start. This is the point “moderate” proponents of assisted suicide are either unable to recognize, or unwilling to disclose. There is a fundamental disjoint between the idea, on the one hand, that people have an absolute right to autonomy over their own lives, and on the other, that this can be hedged about with all sorts of limitations.
Assisted suicide was sold, initially, as a sort of conditional right, like the right to drink or drive or vote, which could be limited to certain sorts of people. But the logic of assisted suicide does not permit it. It presents suicide not as a tragedy we should wish at all costs to prevent, but as a blessing, a release from intolerable suffering – so much so, that we should not merely allow people to end their own lives, but others to do so on their behalf; and not merely allow it, but require it – even subsidize it. So it is that, in the space of a few years, assisted suicide has gone from a crime to a right to a public service.
It could not be otherwise. And if such a right is not conditional, but inherent, a basic human right, how can it be limited: whether by the severity of the pain, or the proximity of death, or the identity of the sufferer? On what principle of justice do we tell a person they may seek relief from endless torment on the basis of a physical disability, but not mental illness? How do we extend such mercy to an adult, but not a child?
Perhaps once, we might have held the line. But it is too late for that now.
Congratulations to Hungary on recognizing traditional families!
Hungary has taken the morally good step to recognizing the true definition of marriage and family. This continues a trend in the country to create a Christian and specifically Catholic society. They are not welcoming in droves of Muslim immigrants, and they are now defining marriage and families as they ought to be: a man and a woman raising children.
There are other aspects to the laws being passed:
- The law recognises that a child’s sex as it appears on their birth cert is the one which should be honoured.
- It recognised that ‘The mother is a woman, the father is a man’.
- Adoption could only go to couples that involved men and women, with singles having to apply for special permission to adopt a child.
George Soros, who is Hungarian, tried to derail this legislation and turn the country away from its Christian heritage, and he has failed. The rest of the world should take note!
Netflix on Instagram: "Praise Satan"?!? - not fake!
This is absolutely real. Someone on Twitter said he thought it was fake, so I had to check for myself. On their Instagram page, they have a number of photos and music. If you go through about 3 or 4, you land on one that says "Praise Satan":
What the heck is going on here? This is quite disturbing.
If you want to see for yourself, go here: https://www.instagram.com/p/CItdjj7hROw/
The only hopeful thing about all of this is there is pushback from the comments. Netflix seems to be getting worse all the time. Perhaps its time for people to start cancelling their service.
Vatican Nativity Scene 2020 - Fr. Mark Goring, CC
Fr. Mark Goring pretty much sums up my thoughts about this whole situation!
Pope addresses 13,254th most important issue in the Church
Okay, I'm not saying this is necessarily wrong, but how is this a major issue for Catholics in the world? It just seems rather than teaching the Catholic Faith, Pope Francis is more concerned with promulgating his socialist economic theories. As mentioned before, these issues may be indirectly linked to Catholic teaching, but they are not the core of what the Church is about. All I ever hear from this pope is social justice commentary.
If Bergoglio wasn't the pope and said the same things, he'd be viewed a modern-day social justice warrior. Perhaps an idealistic, pie-in-the-sky activist who just makes random pronouncements about "making the world a better place".
He uses what Patrick Coffin calls "weaponized ambiguity". He continually talks in terms of solidarity, fraternity, community, etc. It's a very vague emotion-based approach. People can attach to whatever he says any meaning they want.
A quote from the news article:
The meeting is an event that “challenges every person of good will to rethink, even more today, the relationship between man, nature and the Creator as a factor of profound balance and communion,” the pope said, “in the search not for the logic of profit, but of service, not of the exploitation of resources, but of care and attention for nature as a welcoming home for all.”
What is the "logic of profit"? Can that be explained? Or are we to simply assume and attach our own ideas?
He says in search, not of exploitation of resources, but of care and attention for nature as a welcoming home for all. Again, what does this mean?
Think about it. What is exploitation? It has a negative connotation, meaning to just take advantage of someone or something for our own personal gain without considering the other person. Okay, so how does this apply to agriculture?
Imagine a farmer who grows carrots on many acres of land. He listens to the pope speaking on this subject. How does he implement what the pope is saying? How does he plant and harvest his carrots so that he is not "exploiting" the resource of carrots but instead he is searching for care and attention for nature as a welcoming home for all?
Does he go into his carrot field and shout out, "This carrot field is here for the care and attention for nature as a welcoming home for all!"
My point is what he is saying is meaningless. Does he think profits are bad? I would say he probably does. He has never spoken positively about them. So why not just come out and say he believes in a planned economy in which prices are determined and workers are compensated based on planned wages. At least then we'd know what he is saying. But he speaks in code. Half of what he says barely makes any sense. By and large, it just seems completely meaningless.
To be fair, I guess he is criticizing his impression of how agriculture works. In his mind, a farm owner goes to a place and takes over massive amounts of land. Probably in the process of doing so, he uproots many poor people who have nowhere to turn. In fact, the land is probably currently providing a sustainable life for hundreds of small farmers, who although not rich, have plenty to eat and can enjoy a good life.
So the rich man just kicks them all off the land. You see, rich people can do whatever they want and poor people are forced to comply. Once this rich person owns hundreds of acres of land, he employs people to work the land. Many of the workers he hires used to own the land themselves but now they work for very little. On top of this, hundreds of other poor people with no other choice but to work for him start doing the extremely difficult tasks while the rich landowner sits back in comfort in his huge mansion.
He pays everyone almost nothing, since the wages he pays are just based on a whim. Is he feeling stingy and paying them ten cents per hour or is he feeling generous and giving them a whole twenty cents an hour? It doesn't matter what he decides, workers have no other choice but to accept this wage.
The owner then has a massive harvest in which he sells his carrots or whatever else at a huge profit, again to very poor people who can barely afford what he is offering. For example, they make $20 per week, but he charges them $1 for a single carrot. What else can they do? The farmer incurred total expenses of a million dollars, but he will now sell his products for $100 million. He gets $99 million for himself. Meanwhile his workers are on the brink of starvation.
Eventually after several decades of making hundreds of millions of dollars and paying no taxes (because the rich never do), the rich man fires everyone and retires. Of course, he abandons the land and stops tending to it. In his thinking, he owns it, he can do whatever he wants with it! Soon after, the land dries up and everything dies. It becomes a sort of desert, devoid of all life.
In this cartoon world, as Tom Woods might call it, it's pretty simple. Maybe in this context the words of Pope Francis could have some discernible meaning? Hard to say really. But this isn't reality. In reality, capitalism is far more complex than this, and has benefitted people more than any other economic system by far.
A few points:
- Rich people pay way more taxes, as an amount and a percentage, than anyone else.
- Owners can't pay whatever wages they want. They must pay the prevailing wage or they won't get enough workers. A small percentage of people actually receive minimum wage.
- Having one's own business is far riskier than receiving wages. Most businesses fail. It's false to think that every business owner is wealthy and every worker is poor.
- Profits are far from guaranteed. Some people spend their life savings on a business and spend years working on it until they make any money. Sometimes they sadly never earn back their spending.
- If farmers can own their own land, they are incentivized to reduce waste, improve efficiency, and maintain the value of the land. Socialism encourages the opposite as there is no personal ownership.
- Many agencies, such as some in the UN, encourage small-time farming which is inherently risky to the farmers and far less efficient. It just sounds good.
- Profits are good. They are signals in the market that new companies should enter. Profits mean there is money to be made and eventually prices are reduced because of this.
How can anyone see the world and truly believe that capitalism makes people worse off? In communist countries you have bread lines. In capitalist countries you have lines and lines of various breads.
The pope's duty and mission is to spread the Gospel, to spread the Church and the message of Jesus Christ. Our Lord came for our salvation, not to tell us profit is a bad thing.
Boaz before he got married? [meme]
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/21263948-catholic-memes
The Hail Mary Prayer - Catholic Prayers
Full of Grace,
The Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou among women,
and blessed is the fruit
of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary,
Mother of God,
pray for us sinners now,
and at the hour of our death.
Latin Version:
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum. Benedicta tu in mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Iesus. Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus, nunc, et in hora mortis nostrae. Amen.
Further Information about the Hail Mary Prayer:
The Hail Mary or Ave Maria Prayer is one of the most popular Catholic prayers and I would like to explain a little about its importance.
The Hail Mary comes from the words of the angel Gabriel during the Annunciation to Mary that she would bear a son named Jesus. The words of the first part of the prayer come from what the angel said to her. The second part of the prayer which begins with Holy Mary proclaims that she is the Mother of God and we ask her to pray for us now and at the hour of our death before our hopeful reunion with Our Lord. When reciting the prayer with others, typically one person will recite the first part and everyone else will recite the second part.
As you can see the prayer is Biblical. Everything in the first section comes directly from an Archangel of heaven. The second part is simply saying Mary is the Mother of God and asking her to pray for us.
We need to clarify a few points about this prayer. First, Catholics believe in the communion of saints, meaning we can ask for the intercession of saints in heaven just like we'd ask for the prayers of our friends and family on earth. We do not believe that death disconnects us from those who enjoy the beatific vision. Therefore there is nothing wrong with asking for saints to interceded for us. Mary, being the holiest human being who is perfect in all virtue, and the mother of our Savior is the best person of all the saints to ask for intercession. She knows her son better than any other human person. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to ask her to pray for you to her son.
Another point that requires some clarification is the appellation of Mary as "Mother of God". There is a simple syllogism which makes this point quite simple:
1. Mary is the Mother of Jesus Christ
2. Jesus Christ is God.
3. Therefore, Mary is the Mother of God.
It's straightforward. But some people have gone too far in alleging that Catholics are saying more than we actually are. By Mother of God, we are not saying Mary precedes God or brought God into existence or any such thing. Despite being the holiest and greatest of all creatures, Mary remains a creature and is not divine. She is not the fourth person of the Holy Trinity, nor is she equal to God. We give her great honour and respect, but never worship as that would be against the First Commandment and Catholic teaching.
I hope this explanation gives some clarification about the Hail Mary Prayer. Most prominently, the prayer is featured in the Holy Rosary which Our Lady in her appearance at Fatima tells people to recite daily. The Rosary is a beautiful collection of prayers. No one can love Our Blessed Mother more than Jesus does. Therefore there is no danger in asking for her powerful intercession. She loves us all like a Mother since she is the Mother of all Humanity.
Readings for Wednesday, December 16, 2020 in the Catholic Church
Readings for Wednesday, December 16, 2020 in the Catholic Church
Wednesday of the Third Week of Advent
Lectionary: 189
Reading 1
IS 45:6C-8, 18, 21C-25
I am the LORD, there is no other;
I form the light, and create the darkness,
I make well-being and create woe;
I, the LORD, do all these things.
Let justice descend, O heavens, like dew from above,
like gentle rain let the skies drop it down.
Let the earth open and salvation bud forth;
let justice also spring up!
I, the LORD, have created this.
For thus says the LORD,
The creator of the heavens,
who is God,
The designer and maker of the earth
who established it,
Not creating it to be a waste,
but designing it be lived in:
I am the LORD, and there is no other.
Who announced this from the beginning
and foretold it from of old?
Was it not I, the LORD,
besides whom there is no other God?
There is no just and saving God but me.
Turn to me and be safe,
all you ends of the earth,
for I am God; there is no other!
By myself I swear,
uttering my just decree
and my unalterable word:
To me every knee shall bend;
by me every tongue shall swear,
Saying, “Only in the LORD
are just deeds and power.
Before him in shame shall come
all who vent their anger against him.
In the LORD shall be the vindication and the glory
of all the descendants of Israel.”
Responsorial Psalm
PS 85:9AB AND 10, 11-12, 13-14
R. (Isaiah 45:8) Let the clouds rain down the Just One, and the earth bring forth a Savior.
I will hear what God proclaims;
the LORD–for he proclaims peace to his people.
Near indeed is his salvation to those who fear him,
glory dwelling in our land.
R. Let the clouds rain down the Just One, and the earth bring forth a Savior.
Kindness and truth shall meet;
justice and peace shall kiss.
Truth shall spring out of the earth,
and justice shall look down from heaven.
R. Let the clouds rain down the Just One, and the earth bring forth a Savior.
The LORD himself will give his benefits;
our land shall yield its increase.
Justice shall walk before him,
and salvation, along the way of his steps.
R. Let the clouds rain down the Just One, and the earth bring forth a Savior.
Alleluia
See IS 40:9-10
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
Raise your voice and tell the Good News:
Behold, the Lord GOD comes with power.
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
Gospel
LK 7:18B-23
At that time,
John summoned two of his disciples and sent them to the Lord to ask,
“Are you the one who is to come, or should we look for another?”
When the men came to the Lord, they said,
“John the Baptist has sent us to you to ask,
‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we look for another?’”
At that time Jesus cured many of their diseases, sufferings, and evil spirits;
he also granted sight to many who were blind.
And Jesus said to them in reply,
“Go and tell John what you have seen and heard:
the blind regain their sight,
the lame walk,
lepers are cleansed,
the deaf hear, the dead are raised,
the poor have the good news proclaimed to them.
And blessed is the one who takes no offense at me.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)