Thursday, June 24, 2010

CNN pushes gay agenda once again

A new show called Gary + Tony Have a Baby will air tonight on CNN. It was produced by Soledad O'Brien. I saw a brief interview with her and these two guys yesterday on Larry King. I doubt you could find someone who sounds more fabricated than Soledad. You know how sometimes you hear a news person speaking and it sounds artificial, well Soledad has brought it to a whole new level. Everything she says sounds like a Hallmark card. Sounds very disingenuous.

Anyway, CNN will be celebrating gay adoption with this program which took over a year to fully produce. First of all, the name of the program is pretty misleading. Gary and Tony Have a Baby. They didn't have a baby, some random woman did. And they really pushed the envelope to make this one of the most twisted birth stories ever.

One of the men, I forget which, gave some of his sperm to a clinic. Then some random woman donated an ovum. Then they took these two cells, combined them in a petri dish in a scientist's lab using all sorts of medical equipment, microscopes, etc. Just thinking of the loving way this baby came into the world makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. Anyway, after they had combined these cells, outside the body, the implanted them in ANOTHER woman's body who acted as the surrogate. Hopefully this child has a high IQ, he'll need it to understand how he was born.

Imagine the confusion for this child. First of all, who is his mother? It could either be the woman who gave the ovum. Or maybe it's more proper to say it was the surrogate. Or maybe he has two mothers. But it doesn't really matter because whichever one of these women is his mother, neither will be raising him. He's been denied that opportunity by these two men. Maybe if the child is lamenting his lack of a mother, he can find solace in the fact that he has 2 fathers. Of course, he really only has one father, but I'm sure the other will demand to be known as such also.

I believe a child has a right to live with his mother and father. I believe he has a right to be born through an act of love and self-giving in the marital embrace, not at the cold hands of a scientist in a white lab in a petri dish. A child has a right to know who his mother and father is, it's so vital to his understanding of himself. I think it's a tragedy that a child has to be raised in an environment of confusion, where even simple questions are difficult to answer.

Children are not rights that everyone has. They are gifts. People are using biomedical engineering to produce children because they "want them", not because they are seeking the welfare of the child. They're not pets that you get for personal fulfillment or something.

This child will never know his mother, or will only know her at an arms length and very impersonal way. The loving embrace of a mother cannot be replicated by two men. This child will be stripped away from his mother right after birth to fulfill the wishes of these two gay men. This is so sad. Sometimes a child's mother will die during childbirth, and this represents a real tragedy. This situation is not much different.

Obviously this baby will not breastfeed, but also will never share his mother's loving embrace. Mothers share a particular bond with a child, much different than a father's bond. This baby will experience only a bond with his father and with another man unrelated to him.

I'm not saying homosexual people are evil or bad. They are creations of God just like everyone else. But children deserve to be born into the loving embrace of a mother and to hopefully have the love of a father as well. Children are not the latest accessory or the last step in normalization of homosexual behavior. People should stop trying to fit the square piece into the round hole where it doesn't belong.

Also, regardless of how this baby was conceived, developed, and was born, he is a loved child of God who is owed as much respect as any other child, no different than a child born from rape.

Let's pray for everyone involved.

3 comments:

  1. These men are evil, as are you and I (Matthew 7:11). None of us are good, only God is good.

    Do you want to be saved - Have you obeyed Acts 2:38?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm just a random passer-by, and I must say: You are one transparent fool.

    "I believe he has a right to be born through an act of love and self-giving in the marital embrace, not at the cold hands of a scientist in a white lab in a petri dish."

    Here you make issue with the way in which a child is conceived. This is all that matters on this point, right? You want the child to be born of love, and not... by those "evil" scientists for perhaps, oh I know don't know... an infertile couple incapable of conceiving a child?

    And you go on to conclude: "Also, regardless of how this baby was conceived, developed, and was born, he is a loved child of God who is owed as much respect as any other child, no different than a child born from rape."

    Why even make issues with how a child is conceived at the beginning of this essay if you're just going to say, "oh well... none of that stuff matters anyhow."

    Furthermore, I don't think anyone would disagree that a child born of rape deserves respect. However, a mother ought to have the right to terminate that embryo before it has to grow up as a product of HER and THE RAPISTS genetics. A child born of rape is a child that was forced upon a woman...

    FFS, you just casually glide over these difficult moral conundrums with your deaf pseudo-reason. You've got too much old man with white beard on the brain, that's the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Damn, you guys are way too obsessed with gay sex. I'm content having sex with my wife, therefore, it doesn't bother me if my neighbor is gay, or even if my child grows up to be gay. There's certainly nothing wrong with putting your penis in another man as long as he consents. So hurry up and go do it. You'll feel a lot better and then you'll be able to focus on other, more important things, like feeding the poor.

    ReplyDelete